News

Nancy Vezner Nancy Vezner

Why SNAP is good for the local economy

In 1964, as part of a series of progressive reforms, President Johnson signed a food security law that we know today as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). 

SNAP provides benefits to low-income households to supplement their grocery budgets so they can afford nutritious food. Thirteen percent of Wisconsin’s residents now are enrolled in the program, and 86 percent of the food benefits go to households that include a child, disabled, or elderly person.

SNAP is good for our local economies, as well as for our hungry neighbors. Every dollar invested in SNAP food benefits produces at least $1.50 in economic benefits. 

But the authors of Project 2025, which include 140 former members of the Trump administration, considered expanding SNAP benefits during Covid “a dramatic overreach”.  And now they want to take away food benefits through work requirements that will not reduce unemployment, but just are a backdoor way to push vulnerable Wisconsinites out of the SNAP program.

Voters should wonder why the far-right authors of Project 2025 want to end the economic benefits of SNAP while also harming Americans who legitimately need SNAP food benefits to help them survive.

This November, reject Project 2025 and the candidates who would implement it.

Read More
Celeste Koeberl Celeste Koeberl

Correcting the record on new Title IX regulations

Some people are spreading misinformation—based on mistaken beliefs and fears—about Title IX regulations that took effect on August 1, 2024.

Instead, let’s base our discussions about the new Title IX regulations and their application in our Hudson School District on factually and legally accurate information, including that:

Our US Constitution does not yet guarantee equal rights to women and girls, because the Equal Rights Amendment has not yet been adopted; that’s why we need the federal 1964 Civil Rights Act and Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. 

Title IX protects people from discrimination based on sex in education programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance. The Biden administration has promulgated Title IX regulations that define the term "on the basis of sex" as prohibiting “discrimination on the basis of sex stereotypes, sex characteristics, pregnancy or related conditions, sexual orientation, and gender identity.” 

This definition was established by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) four years ago—in an opinion written by conservative Justice Neil M. Gorsuch who was appointed by former President Trump—when SCOTUS ruled it was illegal under the 1964 Civil Rights Act’s prohibition of job discrimination on the basis of sex to fire employees or not hire them because of their sexual orientation or gender identity (Bostock v. Clayton County).

The new Title IX regulations do not apply to school sports and athletic competitions. Those issues will be considered in separate federal regulations, sometime later.

Unless stayed by a court, the new Title IX regulations are legally binding and enforceable. 

On August 16, 2024, SCOTUS refused to lift the lower court orders that have blocked the new Title IX regulations in 26 states, but Wisconsin is not one of those states; that vote was 5 to 4, with Justice Gorsuch joining the dissent by Justices Sotomayor, Kagan and Jackson.

The new Title IX regulations remain in effect in states that did not challenge them, including in Wisconsin.

Public comments at our Hudson School Board meetings should be informed by accurate understandings of these facts and law. 

Read More
Pam Fricke Pam Fricke

Why selling off the St. Croix County Health Center is a mistake

Why Selling Off the Health Center is a Mistake

Family values are strong here in Wisconsin, and most folks would agree that we take care of our aging parents.  Not only is it a nice thing to do, but we have a moral obligation to help our seniors.

So why is the St. Croix County board of supervisors even considering selling off the Health Center Campus in New Richmond? And it isn’t just happening here; other Wisconsin county boards are also looking at privatizing their county nursing homes. It’s going on in Sauk, Portage and Lincoln counties to name a few.  

Our county nursing home has been operating in the black since its second year, and construction loan payments are subsidized by the county budget. About 3 cents of every $1 of County property tax revenue pays down the $15 million balance on the $21 million 20-year loan.

Selling it to the highest bidder would still leave millions owed, and there’s no guarantee that a for-profit, private operator would continue to serve Medicaid or reduced-pay residents. Good luck getting into another facility, as there are only 362 skilled nursing beds in our county.

Attend the August 27, 5 p.m, meeting of the County Board, and make a public comment. Our Health Center Campus has higher value to us than any sale price. It doesn’t make financial sense nor is it the morally right thing to do.  Let’s show up and let our supervisors know that their budgets are moral documents—they reveal our values and priorities.

Read More
St. Croix County Democratic Party St. Croix County Democratic Party

988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline

Help a friend, relative, neighbor or yourself by calling, texting or chatting 988.

Read More
St. Croix County Democratic Party St. Croix County Democratic Party

Rotary Flag Program

Hudson Rotary sponsors flag program to help area nonprofits and get flags into your yard.

Read More